In product engineering, success isn’t defined by how much code is written, but by how well the product performs, how it delights users, and how efficiently teams deliver value. That’s why modern engineering leaders track metrics that go beyond commits, lines of code, or pull requests.
These broader metrics provide a more holistic view of product health, team efficiency, and real-world impact.
“What gets measured gets managed — but what you measure defines what success looks like.”
While metrics like code coverage, velocity, or number of deployments offer some insight, they don’t tell the full story. They miss:
To drive meaningful growth, we need metrics that connect engineering output to user and business value.
Here are several essential metrics that reflect success more accurately:
Time taken from code commit to production. A shorter lead time indicates agility and faster delivery cycles.
Percentage of deployments that result in failure or require a rollback. Lower is better and reflects stability.
How quickly the team can recover from a system failure or outage. Critical for reliability and uptime.
Measuring user satisfaction helps connect engineering work to real user impact.
Which features are used most? This helps teams double down on what matters and identify what's unused.
Tracks how much “quick fix” code exists compared to clean, maintainable code—impacting long-term scalability.
How often the team delivers new code to production. High-performing teams deploy frequently and safely.
Measuring success in product engineering goes far beyond lines of code. True success is about shipping reliable features, keeping systems stable, and delighting users. By focusing on the right metrics, engineering teams can continuously improve, align with business goals, and deliver meaningful value at scale.